If that means 30 percent fewer print books were produced and sold, ebooks have made a significant impact on the environment. An analysis by the cleantech group finds, when used to replace paper. Dont be misled about paper versus electronic books. Are reading ebooks on ereaders environmentally friendly. A digital book, magazine, or newspaper is an intangible virtual item. By the end of 2008, sales of ebook readers like the kindle and. First, no paper is being used to create electronic books versus a lot of paper being used to create thousands or even millions of physical copies of a book. Sure, carbon is consumed in the process of recycling the paper stock but.
No trees are destroyed to print the ebooks and you also save a lot of ink which eventually affects the environment. The manufacture and distribution of paper production, in books, both are decidedly. The newspaper and book publishing industries consume 153 billion gallons of water each year. If amazon, which constitutes roughly 6070% of ebook sales, was actually. Books make it easy to find something truly special, even if the cover is a bit worn or faded. Yet, the negative environmental impact of print books really stems from the rate at which one reads their print books. When the news broke, we published a piece on 10 reasons e books are better than print. Ebooks are better for the environment because they save on paper, however with paper books, you will not have to worry about your reader getting dropped, malfunctioning or breaking down as you would with an ebook. The fact that its illegal in 50 states and the district of columbia to toss your ereader into the trash it contains hazardous wastea. Study paints kindle ereader a dark shade of green cnet. Its said that those who swapped to an ereader between 2009.
Ecolibris is following the discussion and providing you with links to articles, reports and other sources of information that address this issue. Each of us has to evaluate our own reading habits and preferences. If youre looking for a way to lower your impact on the environment, an old book is a good place to start. Should i stop buying paper books and use an ereader. The book vs ereader argument really centers around the co2. I would like to thank my oppnent for creating this short debate. On top of that, our landfills are composed of about 26% paper, and the publishing. As the technology has advanced, many people have switched to this type of reading. Though ebooks may be easier and faster to read, studies show paper books are better for comprehension.
Although paper books have their advantages the disadvantages seem to overwhelm in many cases. Stephen lowman makes an important contribution to the ongoing dialogue about the impact of e books vs. E books are more damaging to your physical and mental health than you might think, which is why we should all go back to using paper books. However the majority of ebooks are not read on dedicated ereaders but on. Price is a clear factor affecting e book consumption, with 52 percent of u. While most hardcover books are printed in asia, most paperbacks are. But lets do the math and see what are the advantages of ebooks over traditional books. You cant save the environment without giving up some things you like. Papers book the ereader and paper book are becoming hot topic for many reasons today. Printed book an environmental analysis by dealva jade dowdhinkle a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of science in the school of print media in the college of imaging arts and sciences of the rochester institute of technology may 2012 primary thesis advisor. Keep it longer and you save 168kg of co 2 per year the amount produced by 22. A paper book, magazine, or newspaper is a tangible item that you can pick up and hold while you are reading it. When talking about the books vs ebooks debate, often youll hear people talk about how ebooks and ereaders help protect the environment.
Electronic books can be considered far more environmentally friendly than traditional paper books for several reasons. The printed book is a significant waste of energy, water and. With the advance of phones, tablets, and ereaders, ebooks have become a popular reading standard. The waste of energy, water and paper caused by pulping so many books must be considerable by comparison if a genuine comparison is even possible. Or would it be better for the environment if we all read books digitally on. Calculate the water consumption for physical books vs such chips and see which. Choosing books to take on holiday has got more difficult in recent years. Pulp mills contribute to air, water and land pollution. The production and use of paper has a number of adverse effects on the environment which are known collectively as paper pollution. Its not just buying ebooks that matters, said the reports author, emma ritch. Print or digital there isnt one right answer for which is better for the planet in all circumstances. Should i stop buying paper books and use an ereader instead. They save space and thus transport and co2 per kg when it comes. However, one thing we cant say is that simply by using an ereader or computer to read, we are always choosing the more sustainable option.
The advantages of ebooks versus traditional books top. When trying to decide wether you want ebooks or traditional paper books, you have to consider certain things, such as the physical characteristics of each product, and the effect the production of these products have on the environment. According to one lifecycle analyses of printed books versus ereaders, the energy, water, and raw materials needed to make a single ereader is equal to that of 40to50 books. However, the average carbon footprint associated with the production of a single paper book is only about 7. Ecofriendly you dont affect the environment while reading an ebook. Paper versus digital media environmental impact green. And while you can flip ahead in an ebook, you can t do so in a matter of seconds and flip right back to your page. There are pros to both ebooks and traditional books. Producing ink for printing releases volatile organic compounds into the atmosphere, which can aggravate smog and asthma.
When you seek to reduce your impact on the environment, you normally look to reuse as much as possible. I just love paper books, the smell, the weight, the paper, the covers, the. Book lovers are opting for both so we are going to delve into the pros and cons of each and their carbon footprint. Negative environmental impact are ebooks more green. Or would it be better for the environment if we all read books digitally on tablets, slates and ereaders. Presumably, all the ebooks of freedom can be easily updated online, much like a software update. A new study analyzing the amazon kindle electronic book reader s impact on the environment suggests that, on average, the carbon emitted over the life of the device is offset after the first year of use.
Making an applestoapples comparison of the environmental impact of paper versus digital media is difficult, if not impossible. Discarded paper is a major component of many landfill sites, accounting for about 35%. Are electronic books for ecofriendly than traditional. Now it is a question not just of what to read but how on paper, tablet, ereader, or perhaps even a phone and. Last week, the book industry released figures showing that e book sales were down so far this year the first time they have declined while print remained relatively steady. It takes more energy to manufacture and ship a paper book than to download an ebook. Still, theres something about the feel of an oldfashioned paper book. Ebooks save the energy consumed by book production, save trees from destruction, reduce the use of paper, eliminate packing materials and the energy associated with packaging and delivery, and reduce the energy and. Paper production often poses risks to virgin, oldgrowth forests. Nowadays, you can use almost any smart device to read books, smartphones, tablets, computers, and ipads.
Use an amazon kindle to full storage capacity and it is claimed you can offset the emissions caused by its manufacture in a year. As you can see, both types of books have many advantages. Despite the facts, you might be asking yourself, why should i care about the environmental impact of printed books vs ebooks. In terms of the effect on the climate, the emissions created by a single ereader are equal to roughly 100 books. For decades, researchers have been focusing their studies on how people utilize, comprehend, and process digital and paper reading material. One study highlighted that reading ebooks on the amazon kindle, for example, is only more green having read 23 books on the device. Pros and cons computer tablets are becoming cheaper and cheaper these days whether you want a dedicated ereader like kindle or a more versatile all. According to a study by james madison university that uses eyetracking software, readers are more likely to skim ebooks than paper books, which leads to less understanding of the content.
However, ebooks slowly becoming more and more popular than paper books has its advantages and disadvantages. Trees are the lungs of the earth, so saving them is a good thing. Technology plays an incredibly important role in our daytoday lives. E books, one of the newest electronic sources are becoming more and more talked about in debates dealing with readings. E books were supposed to be preferred over textbooks by now. E books versus printed books is an infographic video that compares e books and printed books. But that doesnt mean books go easy on the environment. Either the ink get fades away or the paper starts degrading. Is reading on an ebook reader better or worse for the environment. Theres a lot of misinformation about paper and print versus ebooks and.
519 1169 91 212 352 1206 1079 1549 1527 1442 575 1295 999 1057 252 440 1029 552 1586 329 1515 1641 184 990 540 484 561 956 636 1014 1372 933 1185 980 505